We are currently experiencing slightly extended delivery schedules due to the COVID-19 outbreak and "shelter in place" order within our city. We appreciate your patience given these unusual circumstances and are working diligently to overcome these delays.
First-ever Experimental Verification of WAIM Push-back Process Simulation

First-ever Experimental Verification of WAIM Push-back Process Simulation

From Moldex3D

Fluid-assisted injection molding (FAIM) process applies a technique to let assisted fluid enter after plastic injection molding and form a hollow structure inside products. FAIM can produce hollow parts with good dimension control that conventional injection and blow molding cannot achieve. Also, unlike traditional injection molding, the fluid can hold pressure from the inner part for better pressure distribution across thickness and therefore can produce better surface finishes, reduce shrinkage and residual stress and achieve higher dimensional accuracy. As such, the technique of FAIM keeps getting promoted with lots of new patents of process methodology all over the world [i, ii, iii].

According to the amount of plastic melt injected into the cavity, we can categorize the FAIM process generally into two types:

  1. Short-shot method: In this early developed FAIM application, the amount of the injected plastic is less than the cavity space and rely on fluid to press and full fill the cavity. This method is very suitable for rod shape or large size hollow products, and the hollow rate is normally lower than 35%.
  2. Full-shot method: With injecting the full amount of resin into the cavity space, assisted fluid then only supports to pack more material for shrinkage during the cooling stage and collaborates with different techniques (to be discussed later) for better core-out control. Thus, it allows a wider range of hollow rate, and can effectively improve sink mark and warpage issues for thin-plate shaped product.

Full-shot FAIM process is a more favored technique among manufacturers since the short-shot method is more likely to cause defects like hesitation flow marks. For example, push-back is a common technique of water-assisted injection molding (WAIM) (shown in Fig. 1). In this molding method, the entrances for plastic melt and for water are at two different sides of the cavity, and water is injected after the cavity is fully filled to push the plastic melt back into the injection unit. With this technique, it can not only eliminate the flow mark issue in the short-shot method but also reduce material waste by reusing the resin that flows back to the injection unit and taking overflow out from the cavity. However, this technique requires a special design of the nozzle to prevent the melt from flowing back during the filling stage. Also, the melt and fluid entrances at the two sides must be considered in the product design.

Read The Full Story Here >>

During my time as a contact engineer at AMECO-USA I was able to work directly with Rob. The knowledge base he has gathered over the years is quite extensive and was key to the project we were tasked with at the time. Speaking with Rob on many different business and engineering topics explained how his company became successful. I look forward to working with him again and would recommend him for most any engineering project.

Steven HernandezContract Engineer, AMECO

Our Design Engineering group has worked with Rob for the last 2 ½ years. He has helped us improve some existing molds and worked closely with us on new product designs on manufacturability, resin selection, mold flow analysis, mold design resulting in quality parts. Rob is very responsive and provides significant value. Rob participated with us and our molder in three-way Design Reviews. I highly recommend.

Rob. Preston PierceVP Design Engineering, Alcohol Monitoring Systems

I have been working with Shadow for nearly 5 years and each time it has been informative for both me and my customers. Their professionalism and state-of-the-art services have helped us remain competitive in today’s tight economy. At Sare Plastics we always strive for excellence and that is why we continue to work with Rob and his team for our engineering needs.

Bart StuchellPresident, Sare Plastics

Rob has been working with Moldex3D for 8 years and before hand he was already a veteran in this field. His background and domain knowledge in polymer processing development has been impressive to everyone in our company. Working with Rob is indeed reliable and delighted, which helps the projects finished with satisfaction. I herein recommend Rob as your valuable engineering partner to work with.

Kenny LuCEO, Moldex3D Northern America

Robert has worked and managed the technical projects for a number of major programs for my previous company; providing Plastics filling & FEA simulations. His technical expertise is excellent and quite extensive, providing his clients with design ideas that were out-of-the-box and very affective. He is easy person to work and achieves the goals set out by the client.

Jim KempthornApplication Engineer, Ferro Corporation

Over the years, GECOM Corp. has collaborated with Shadow Polymers on many occasions. When called upon, Shadow has always provided an analytical expertise which has allowed GECOM to successfully improve at both the component and tooling design levels. In the fast paced and demanding world of automotive manufacturing, Shadow has proven to be an invaluable ally.

GECOM Corp. Injection Molding Engineering Department, Greenburg, IN